Effectuation theoretical debate: systematic review and research agenda

dc.contributor.authorDIAS, Suzi Elen Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorIIZUKA, Edson Sadao
dc.contributor.authorVILAS BOAS, E.
dc.contributor.authorOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2111-3587
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-02T00:07:00Z
dc.date.available2021-10-02T00:07:00Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-28
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to understand the theoretical discussion of effectuation since the seminal paper in 2001 and to propose an agenda for future studies. Design/methodology/approach – Systematic literature review and content analysis of 71 papers. Findings – Most papers performed a replication of the concepts empirically, and few studies proposed to understand theoretical aspects of effectuation, among them, some authors presented theoretical advances to improve the approach and others participated in an ongoing debate that shows there is no consensus on whether the approach is theory or if considered, appears to be under construction at a rudimentary level or being questioned. Research limitations/implications – The method requires authors to make choices, so the database used and the criteria defined for searching papers that were analyzed are the main limitations of this research. Practical implications – The authors suggest that researchers, teachers and practitioners use effectuation analytically and reflectively. Social implications – The authors present and analyze the current theoretical debate on effectuation. Results suggest the need for new discussions about the concepts, as well as new theoretical efforts of the researchers to analyze the potentialities and limitations of this approach. Originality/value – Among empirical and applied research, with replications of the concepts of effectuation, this research contributes to a theoretical discussion based on a systematic literature review, seeking to bring new reflections about this approach. Add
dc.description.firstpage41
dc.description.issuenumber1
dc.description.lastpage57
dc.description.volume17
dc.identifier.citationDIAS, Suzi Elen Ferreira; IIZUKA, Edson Sadao; VILAS BOAS, E. Effectuation theoretical debate: systematic review and research agenda. Innovation & Management Review, v. 17, n. 1, p. 41-57, 2019.
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/INMR-12-2018-0094
dc.identifier.issn2515-8961
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.fei.edu.br/handle/FEI/3352
dc.relation.ispartofInnovation & Management Review
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons "Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto sob uma licença Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0). Fonte: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INMR-12-2018-0094/full/pdf?title=effectuation-theoretical-debate-systematic-review-and-research-agenda. Acesso em: 01 out. 2021.
dc.subjectLiterature review
dc.subjectAcademic production
dc.subjectEffectuation limitations
dc.subjectResearch agenda
dc.titleEffectuation theoretical debate: systematic review and research agendapt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
fei.scopus.citations6
fei.scopus.eid2-s2.0-85119927298
fei.scopus.updated2024-07-01
fei.source.urlhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INMR-12-2018-0094/full/html
Arquivos
Coleções