Engenharia Mecânica

URI Permanente desta comunidade

https://repositorio.fei.edu.br/handle/FEI/23

Navegar

Navegando Engenharia Mecânica por Assunto "AA7050"

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Artigo
    Effect of the hardening rules on the creep age forming prediction of 7050 aluminum alloy with experimental verification
    (2018) Oliveira M.C.; Delijaicov S.; Bortolussi R.
    © 2018, The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering.The creep age forming (CAF) has been used in the aerospace sector due to its attractive characteristics that allows producing a component with low residual stress. The process has been studied from the finite-element simulations which are used mainly to predict the springback. However, to accomplish the simulation, it is necessary to set the CAF constitutive equations in the finite-element software. In addition, it is also necessary to define the hardening rule which is applied to determine the creep strain. This work aims to investigate CAF applying the finite-element analysis with the time-hardening rule and strain-hardening rule and thus predicting creep strain, stress relaxation, and springback. The finite-element simulations were accomplished in dies with single and double curvatures and the blank’s material was the alloy AA7050. Furthermore, the Marin–Pao model was implemented in the MSC.Marc software through a user subroutine. This model was fitted to the creep experimental curves and it generated good agreement with the experimental data. The results of the simulations that used the time-hardening rule were similar to the strain-hardening rule, and therefore, if it had been chosen a hardening rule, it would not have generated a significant impact in the CAF simulation results. At the end, the simulated springback was compared to the experimental springback from the literature and the percentage error ranged from 0.46% to 15.33% that indicate the proximity with the literature data. Moreover, other experimental validation was performed, and when compared to the results of this methodology, the calculated error in springback was 6.3%.