From "dot.org" to "dot.gov": Professional Crossings in the Brazilian National Policy on HIV/AIDS
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
Artigo
Data
2012
Autores
CAMPOS, L. C. M.
MENDONÇA, P. M.
ALVES, M. A.
MENDONÇA, P. M.
ALVES, M. A.
Orientador
Periódico
Voluntas
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Citação
CAMPOS, L. C. M.; MENDONÇA, P. M.; ALVES, M. A.
From "dot.org" to "dot.gov": Professional Crossings in the Brazilian National Policy on HIV/AIDS. Voluntas, v. 23, n. 1, p. 236-256, march, 2012.
Texto completo (DOI)
Palavras-chave
Resumo
This article reflects on the importance of the relations between state and society in policy-making in the area of public health. Several studies in various sectors such as health, education, and social services have made similar observations on organizational dynamics and the institutionalization of different models of partnerships or contracts, often based on the analytical model of three sectors. Individuals and their networks of relationships, however, remain an almost unexplored dimension in these types of research. Against this backdrop, this study seeks to analyze the movement of HIV/AIDS activists to governmental organizations working in this same field. The analysis raises questions concerning the forms of individual and institutional learning that help to maintain the distinct character of innovation of the Brazilian policy. Professionals who cross the borders hold a different profile once they have accumulated experience working with grassroots and local NGOs, and have also had the chance to be trained and enhance their technical and managerial capacities, since the government has supported NGOs for a long period. When combined, these experiences allow them to maintain relationships with social movements and give them the ability to navigate through the government bureaucracy and handle technical information about fighting AIDS epidemics, making it possible for them to negotiate strategic collaborations reflecting the interests of different groups. Hence, they constantly reflect on the differences between government and social spaces, and keep questioning and modifying their roles in the light of potential and existing complementarities. © 2011 International Society for Third-Sector Research and The John's Hopkins University.