Degendering organizations? The emergence of postfeminist networks1
Carregando...
Arquivos
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
Artigo
Data
2022-01-05
Autores
COELHO JUNIOR, P. L.
HOLZ, E. B.
SAJONC, R. C.
HEIN, A. S.
HOLZ, E. B.
SAJONC, R. C.
HEIN, A. S.
Orientador
Periódico
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Citação
COELHO JUNIOR, P. L.; HOLZ, E. B.; SAJONC, R. C.; HEIN, A. S. Degendering organizations? The emergence of postfeminist networks1. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 23, n. 3, 2022.
Texto completo (DOI)
Palavras-chave
Resumo
© 2022 Mackenzie Presbyterian University. All rights reserved.Purpose: This article aims to present an initial analysis of a new form of collective action related to gender issues emerging in the Brazilian corporate world. It is based on an empirical investigation through two networks of women executives that aim to encourage gender equity in organizations. The analysis was structured based on the following research question: What is the potential of these networks related to gender equity led by executive women to degender organizations? The findings help to understand the complexity of this phenomenon, with its ambiguities and contradictions. Originality/value: The originality of the article resides in the proposition of the concept of postfeminist networks to understand this new form of collective action for gender equity in the corporate environment. This concept helps researchers in Organizations Studies better understand moderate corporate feminism, reflecting and deflecting feminism. Design/methodology/approach: Qualitative research of exploratory nature, whose investigation strategy was a multiple case study. Data collection occurred in two stages: documentary, and interviews. The interviews were with ten executives who lead and act directly in the management of two networks, both located in São Paulo, and aimed at increasing the representation of women in leadership positions in business. Findings: The results show crucial limitations of these networks. They are related to a claimed distance from feminism and even a disdain for the feminist movement. They also do not consider the intersections between gender and other social markers of difference, such as race, class, and sexuality. Despite these limitations, this experience cannot be neglected. They represent a significant advance in individual strategies that women undertake to occupy spaces in the corporate world and those concerning affinity groups created by executive women within each company. These advances are even more critical in a business environment. There are typically very few women in upper management positions, and where male leaders have done very little in encouraging their presence in upper management.