Impact of the inclusion of variable CO2 cost in the distribution network design
Arquivos
Tipo de produção
Artigo
Data de publicação
2019-09-23
Texto completo (DOI)
Periódico
PRODUCTION (ABEPRO)
Editor
Texto completo na Scopus
Citações na Scopus
1
Autores
Rodrigo de Castro Barros
Mauro Sampaio
CORREA, JOBEL SANTOS
Orientadores
Resumo
Paper aims
This study aims to evaluate the economic-financial impact that the inclusion of environmental variable CO2 cost attributed to transportation (fuel consumption) and manufacturing activities (electricity consumption) represents in a distribution network optimization design.
Originality
This is the first work carried out in Brazil to present a feasible eco-efficient distribution network in the technical and economic aspects considering the tax aspects of ICMS. In addition, this work addresses the inclusion of CO2 as a cost associated with transportation and manufacturing activities. Finally, for the first time in literature, a reference framework that considers environmental variables is presented.
Research method
This study used the systematic literature review method to review the referential framework and carried out a cost reduction using specialist optimization software.
Main findings
The technical and economical feasibility in achieving reduction of both total logistic and CO2 costs in a distribution network design in Brazil and the inexistence of trade-offs without technical solution to the eco-efficient configuration of the distribution network.
Implications for theory and practice
The results of this paper presents a relevant contribution to logistics professionals and researchers, as it was able to present a framework and demonstrated the feasibility of an eco-efficient network design.
Citação
BARROS, R. DE C.; SAMPAIO, M. ; CORREA, J. S. Impact of the inclusion of variable CO2 cost in the distribution network design. PRODUCTION (ABEPRO), v. 29, n. 3, p. 1-14, 2019.
Palavras-chave
distribution network design; eco-efficient distribution network; optimization; strategic decisions; CO2 cost